Cranking it out — a reflection on the end of work by
(166 Stories)

Prompted By Retirement

Loading Share Buttons...

/ Stories

I’ve been a worker all my life. My love affair with work began as an adolescent in a loving family fraught with jeopardy. My father suffered from manic depression, my mother danced between spousal caretaking and denial. McCarthy’s blacklist pursued my old man. My parents sold our modest house on the lake in a bucolic Massachusetts suburb but, before we could take ownership of another home, mortgages collapsed, my father’s sketchy employment dried up, and — figuratively speaking — we became homeless.

We were not without friendship or support. For two years we lived at the good graces of a retired doctor with a stately hillside manor and a kind-hearted Quaker couple who ran a youth hostel. But the failed house swap, my father’s mental condition, his sketchy work options and the move to a new town, a new school filled my life with shadows I could not identify. I began to toughen myself to confront a struggle for survival.

I decided to earn money, “just in case.” So, at eleven, I began to work for a local farmer, picking corn, apples, and potatoes, hayin’, and working in big old barns comforted by the warm-bodied contemplation of cows chewing their cuds. They smelled of molasses and manure.

Work became my armor, my fuel, and my identity. I imagined work in masculine terms. In high school, I worked after school and Saturdays in a machine shop. Pragmatic, yes, ecstatic, too, building stuff — producing — working with a high school pal on lathes, drill presses, welding machines, grinding wheels, romanticizing the grimy parade of American industry in the years of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and a booming Detroit.

I half-dreamed, half-realized a rich life as a budding actor and musician. Jazz, folk music and rock and roll played a counterpoint to the music in my family and I learned to sing in church. Still, my poverty paranoia ground on, binding me to a work ethic and the labor theory of value, a notion that the hours worked, the product produced, whether it be pounds of picked apples, notes played, scripts acted, or words smithed carried more significance than the pleasure of life.

Turmoil ruled, civil rights and U.S. Out of Vietnam swirled in the streets. I landed full of outrage, sarcasm, and political savvy right in the middle of the Haight-Ashbury district.

Oh, we had fun, not to worry. But I was no hippie. I had joined the denizens of San Francisco’s beat-heavy, anarcho-utopian post-dada art scene and set out with my comrades to develop a radical theater. We borrowed from Brecht and commedia dell’ arte to create madcap caper-heavy shows staged outdoors for free in the parks muthafuckah!

I’d never experienced such a heaven. All the pieces fit: I evolved into a political animal, in love with a theater that loved me back. The artists I met were talented, ingenious, utopian, crazy, and directed. I absorbed each significant saturated work hour as skill and wisdom. Hard work.

I was excited, giddy, and grateful. I could vent my anger at the injustices of the present, safely strapped into my work ethic while the road rocketed ahead at the speed of a commedia scene. “Turn on, tune in, drop out” suffered our contempt. I was working. No matter that I made $25 a week out of the hat, everything I needed was free. I happily toiled away in a myopia of engagement, commitment, and fresh air.

I’ve counted the chapters in my life — a childhood in jeopardy, darkness and discovery during adolescence and the teens, public school, private academia, community organizing, theater, collectives in the Rockies, Massachusetts, Maryland and humboldt, carpentry, cutting mine timbers with a chain saw to crafting fine cabinetry, more theater and music salaried by an arts commission, a major migration from one city to another, more music and theater, a decade-plus immersion in publishing, theater production, a return to the typewriter and — rapidly thereafter — the cybernetic word processor. Two novels, five screenplays, acres of short stories, travelogue and memoir, two feature-length documentaries, more political theater, piano trios at the Ritz, punk cabaret noir, two continental circuses (no caged animals), vaudeville nouveau, a master’s degree at 63, a decade of university teaching, cranking it out, cranking it out, cranking it out. Surviving, ecstatic, terrified, making my way, always with remarkable partners, improvising in duet.

Now, it’s beginning to fall away. Despite my instincts, work as a driving force has slowed. A glowing new confusion has set in. If I’m not ‘cranking it out,’ what the hell am I doing? Why am I rushing to finish chores? To make time for…? I like the feeling. I don’t want to show up anywhere. I don’t feel like reciprocating. I’m confused by what reads as lazy but is not.

The confusion began with castigation. Why aren’t you writing? Time’s wasting! Light up your media presence, teach more classes, hit the workshops and lit fests, push hourly life aside to get to the means of production, the means of distribution. It’s nearly impossible to believe that I’m okay. Where will the money come from? Will income and expense trip and fall or dance in harmony? Shouldn’t you be…?

But I’ve been hearing different voices of late: Give yourself time and space; you’ve cultivated civilization’s practical toolshed, information, skills, experience, social purpose, a room of one’s own, a house, a garden, a variegated circle of friends, smart kids to teach, my own colorful past, a hit-and-miss tapestry of calamity and adventure, battle and beauty.

I’m grateful for what I’ve done with my life, humbled by my obsession with the common good, comfortable with rage and acceptance, confident that I’ll cartwheel into the next chapter, cranking it out in a new direction to a different tempo, with a different purpose and an unfathomable result. I can wait. The future will bring it.

Is this retirement? I ask. Nah.
Profile photo of Charles Degelman Charles Degelman
Writer, editor, and educator based in Los Angeles. He's also played a lot of music. Degelman teaches writing at California State University, Los Angeles. 

Degelman lives in the hills of Hollywood with his companion on the road of life, four cats, assorted dogs, and a coterie of communard brothers and sisters.

Visit Author's Website

Characterizations: been there, funny, moving, well written


  1. John Zussman says:

    You ask a question that’s been troubling me lately as well: In a life built around work, what do you do when the work winds down—or if you feel like your life depends on winding it down? Provocative as always. Thanks for sharing this.

    • Thanks, John. I found this a difficult topic to put into words. I felt that I did okay describing a few of the material circumstances that led to my work habit. But most of what I experience in this transition belongs more to realms of philosophy and spirit, challenging realms to put into words.

  2. Suzy says:

    Fascinating tale of your work history through the years. I am intrigued by the line, “I imagined work in masculine terms.” After that you got into theater, music, and revolution, which were neither masculine nor feminine, but universal. You’ve had a lot of amazing chapters, and I’m sure the next one, whenever it finds you, will still be busy and purposeful, even if in different ways.

  3. Charles, you’re a wonderful thinker and feeler and writer.
    Crank on, no caged animal you!

    • Hi, Dana. Thanks so much for re-discovering this story. I had forgotten it and the timely quality of the prompt, as happens so often in Retro. I read it while standing in line at the post office today. Might serve as a springboard for a retirement story!

  4. Betsy Pfau says:

    I somehow missed this two years ago Charlie. Your life has been filled with your own need for self-preservation, your intense drive and fierce intelligence. Perhaps you won’t retire, but will evolve, or “cartwheel” as you put it, into some other phase that will still challenge and fulfill you. Whatever it is, I want to know, as your writing is always fascinating to read. Thank you.

    • Thank you, Betsy, for your kind and supportive words. I’m guessing that the notion of retirement doesn’t apply to me very well. To retire, don’t you have to have worked a steady job? I’m not sure retirement applies to anyone anymore, here in the freedom-loving USA. Most or many working people have been forced out of pension systems (expensive for corporations) and into the stock market. Pensions guarantee, as much as is possible, that you’ll be able to depend on a steady retirement income. Not so with our freedom-loving 401K system. So more people have to stay on their toes, long into old age. Back around to your lovely speculation, cartwheeling feels like the way to go!

  5. Laurie Levy says:

    What a powerful and beautifully written essay, Charles. The paragraph detailing the chapters in your life left me feeling exhausted. It is really hard for those of us with a strong work ethic simply to be and enjoy. Feeling unproductive worries me, but I also feel entitled to that time and space you describe. If not now, when?

    • Thanks for your thoughtful comment, Laurie. I did write that while I was anticipating how I would navigate away from teaching. Ironically, I’m finding that, at least for the moment, I’m busier than ever! Still, I was glad to re-read my reflection on the end of work. I am inching my way toward beatitude… I think. Ommmmmmmm.

  6. I love the Winold Reiss mural (and so many of the WPA pieces). I’m always fascinated by how so many people that had difficult childhoods turned into the strongest and most interesting adults. And then I wonder if that would have happened anyway. We’ll never know, of course, difficult, strength and interest being pretty subjective should someone even see fit to do a study. Seems like your work was and is more than just work, it’s curiosity, creativity, and passion, and it IS who you are. My guess is that will still be true even sitting under the Bodhi tree.

    • Thanks for reading, Barbara. And your observation seems right. Besides being insulation against some unspoken sense of jeopardy, I carried the romantic notion of the 1930s writers, some into the 1950s, Upton Sinclair, Thomas Wolfe, Dos Passos, Steinbeck, Hemingway I suppose, Gary Snyder, even Kerouac, that labor nurtured experience and an everyman [sic] wisdom that gave depth to writing. And my ‘work’ as a musician carried a yeoman-like implication, paying my dues, I suppose. And yeah, I’d probably even ‘work’ at sitting under the Bodhi tree.

Leave a Reply