The Soviet Matter by
50
(76 Stories)

Prompted By Cold War Coping

Loading Share Buttons...

/ Stories

Most Americans regard the Cold War from a unilateral position. For decades, America stood armed and vigilant against the Soviet threat. For some, the experience felt righteous and reassuring. We stood on the bulwarks of freedom and democracy and were willing to make the sacrifice required to keep communism’s dreaded darkness at bay.

Revenge is a dish best served cold.

Others of us saw through the propaganda and subterfuge. We stood apart from the chauvinists, magnates, and militarists and the gray-flannel drones who drove the treadmills of post-war capitalism. We called out the hypocrisy of the American Dream and pointed to another America, riddled with poverty, racism and male dominance. We organized, we resisted, and we succeeded to generate an alternate narrative to the Red Scare.

From right and center, we were supposed to hate them… again. From the left, radicals struggled with how to accommodate the realities and contradictions of the Soviet Union’s impossible dream. But regardless of how we coped, we stood inalterably on the other side of the Iron Curtain.

But what about the Russians? How did they cope? In 1984 George Orwell described a world in which most citizens lived under shifting, perpetual war, saturating surveillance, and propaganda. To continue the state of war, necessary for ongoing subservience, the Orwellian state declared enemies to be friends and friends to be enemies in an endless swirl of loyalties.

It’s fitting that Orwell wrote 1984 in 1947, a year in which a fickle American leadership declared the Soviet Union, our ally during WW II, our enemy. The United States, victorious at the end of WWII, allowed our errand boy, Great Britain — who had suffered terrible losses during the war — to warn the world of the threat the Soviet Union posed to the “free” world.

So mother Russia, who lost half its peasant army until they withdrew from the Western Front in World War One, who lost 20,000,000 people as they led the fight against Hitler and the Nazis, once again became The Red Menace.  the Soviet Union openly admitted at the end of WW II that it would take them generations to recover from the destruction and sacrifice it had borne.

The United States and Britain, eager to reclaim their dominance over war-torn Europe and its battered resources, once again declared the Soviet Union to be our foe. As anti-communism re-established itself, our armaments industry no longer beat swords back into plowshares. The military-industrial complex that Eisenhower so prophetically described demanded that a state of war, even a Cold War, was necessary to liberty, justice, and the American way.  There was money to be made; friends became foes.

The decades passed. The United States built bombs, the USSR built bombs. We built ICBMs and planes, they built ICBMs and planes. We engaged in a space race together, shooting sputniks, monkeys, dogs, humans, and junk into outer space. We scared the hell out of each other.

We engaged in horrific proxy wars in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Cuba, Angola. We aided the rebellions against Soviet satellite nations like Hungary and Poland. The war in Afghanistan, where we backed the CIA’s favorite Pashtun tribe, the Taliban, finally brought the Soviet Union to its knees in the early 1990s.

After the Soviet Union failed, we delivered an economic coup de grace by offering up managed capitalism to the vulnerable former Union, plans that fostered capital accumulation and practically guaranteed the development of oligarchies and mob rule.

Mother Russia had a right to be pissed off. Since the 1920s, just a few years after the Bolshevik Revolution, the brave experiment in socialism had been attacked by twenty-two nations. So, when I watch Putin fuck with us, I remind myself that we had been fucking with Mother Russia since they were reborn as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The Cold War was over. We had won. Won what? We had been using the Soviet “threat” as a demon to continue pumping public tax money into private corporate coffers of weapons manufacturers. Central America exploded. Iran Contra. Clinton. NAFTA. We enjoyed a few years before 9/11 where myopia settled in regarding most things international.

But just like two boxers going fifteen rounds, when two great nations battle, no one emerges unscathed. After Vietnam, American capital, culture, and the national zeitgeist fell into a deep depression. Of course, no one would admit it. As in Middle America, depression did not exist. No one understood post-traumatic stress disorder, but America was suffering from PTSD.

As a wounded imperial power, we struggled to find a new demon. We sold our industries to the highest bidder. We waged a war on drugs. We built a service economy on domestic consumption and tourism. We became cops of the world and ignited a terrible war in the Middle East. We inflated real estate bubbles and information bubbles, then exploded them, all for naught. We elected a lovely, eloquent President to keep our place at the global capital table for eight more years. But really, nothing made money like the Cold War.

Today, I know that the Presidential Idiot can’t keep any of this Cold War stuff in his head. He’s incapable of sequential thought. But I knew that the betrayal of our former WWII ally played into what today we might call Mother Russia’s reprisal. I don’t like Putin, I don’t like democracy undermined by cyber warfare, and I don’t like the exploitative, bling-based cruelty of modern Russia. But I do understand the Russian motive to create chaos. Revenge is a dish best served cold.

 

Profile photo of Charles Degelman Charles Degelman
Writer, editor, and educator based in Los Angeles. He's also played a lot of music. Degelman teaches writing at California State University, Los Angeles. 

Degelman lives in the hills of Hollywood with his companion on the road of life, four cats, assorted dogs, and a coterie of communard brothers and sisters.

Visit Author's Website



Characterizations: right on!, well written

Comments

  1. Suzy says:

    I’m so glad you gave us this totally different perspective on the Cold War. You are so right about how badly the US treated our former ally after WW II. I’m not sure that Putin’s role in the 2016 election can be attributed to that wrong of 70 years earlier, but I suppose it’s as good an explanation as any.

    Interesting that you say that Orwell wrote 1984 in 1947. I had always heard that he wrote it in 1948, and got his title by reversing the last two digits of the then-current year. According to the internet, it was originally published in 1949, which could be consistent with writing it in either (or both) of the preceding years. How chilling to realize that the US was doing in real life what Oceania was doing in the book. Never learned that in my high school English class!

    Thanks for an eye-opening story!

    • Thanks, Suzy. Our harassment of the USSR continued on right through WWII. Much of our strategy post-D-Day was to capture as much German-occupied soil as possible before the “Russkies” got there. Espionage turned immediately after V-E day and we and the Brits began to sabotage the very effective French, Greek, and Yugoslav anti-nazi resistance. They had been organized and run by socialists. Lots of stories there.

  2. Laurie Levy says:

    What a great history lesson. You have given me a new perspective in the way you wrote about things I lived through and studied.

  3. Betsy Pfau says:

    Wow, Charles, you’ve taken us on quite the historical journey from the end of WWII to Putin and the oligarchs giving us the dangerous boob in the White House now and continuing to mess with our democracy. Love that last line: “Revenge is a dish best served cold”. We didn’t give our ally the Marshall Plan and here we are now. Thank you for tracing the lineage of how we got here.

    • Thanks, Betsy, I’m glad you ‘enjoyed’ this alternative version of history. In an addendum to the note I sent to Suzy, the Marshall plan was, of course, of great benefit to western Europe after its tragic destruction. The plan was somewhat cynically motivated by our urgent agenda to keep Europe in our camp, when so many of the now-NATO nations had shown such powerful socialist organizations during the 1930s and the war. Ah, if Weimar Germany had not fallen to the nazis and if only pigs could fly!

Leave a Reply